Differences
Between Affirmative and Defensive Asylum Applications
U.S. “Affirmative”
Asylum Processing with USCIS
In the affirmative
asylum process, individuals who are physically present
in the United States, regardless of how they got here
and regardless of their current immigration status,
may apply for asylum. They do so “affirmatively”
by submitting an application to USCIS. In keeping
with the idea that a genuine asylum-seeker should
present himself/herself to authorities “without
delay,” asylum-seekers must apply for asylum
within one year from the date of last arrival in the
United States, unless they can show changed circumstances
that materially affect their eligibility or extraordinary
circumstances relating to the delay in filing, and
that they filed within a reasonable amount of time
given those circumstances.
The applicant
must file an application (Form I-589) by sending it
to a USCIS Service Center and are seen by Asylum Officers
– in non-adversarial interviews. The interviews
take place at one of the eight Asylum Offices throughout
the U.S. or, if the applicant lives far from one of
those offices, at a District Office.
NOTE:
Affirmative asylum applicants are almost never detained.
They are free to live in the U.S. pending the completion
of their asylum processing with USCIS and, if found
ineligible by USCIS, then with an
Immigration Judge .
Normally,
an affirmative asylum applicant is interviewed by
USCIS within 43 days of application and, if not approved,
is referred by USCIS to an Immigration Judge at the
Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) for
further and de novo consideration. The time period
is somewhat longer if the applicant does not reside
near one of the eight Asylum Offices and an Asylum
Officer is required to go to a distant District Office
to conduct the interview.
Asylum applicants referred to
an Immigration Judge for such processing are also
not detained.
U.S. “Defensive”
Asylum Processing with EOIR
Immigration
Judges with the Executive Office for Immigration Review
(EOIR) hear asylum applications only in the context
of “defensive” asylum proceedings. That
is, applicants request asylum as a defense against
removal from the United States. Immigration Judges
(IJs) hear such cases in adversarial (court-room-like)
proceedings: the IJ is the judge that hears the applicant’s
claim and also hears any concerns about the validity
of the claim raised by the Government, which is represented
by an attorney. The IJ then makes a determination
of eligibility.
If the applicant
is not found eligible for asylum, the IJ determines
whether the applicant is eligible for any other forms
of relief from removal and, if not, will order the
individual removed from the United States.
Aliens generally
are placed into defensive asylum processing in one
of two ways:
- they are referred to an IJ
by Asylum Officers who did not grant asylum to
them, or
- they are placed in removal
proceedings because they
- are undocumented or in violation
of their status when apprehended in the U.S.
or
- were caught trying to enter
the U.S. without proper documentation (usually
at a port-of-entry) and were found to have a
credible fear of persecution or torture.
|